Pfeiffer

(PC) Estrada v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20241:23-cv-00769California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME IGNACIO ESTRADA, No. 1:23-cv-00769 KES GSA (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ORDER

v.

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE JUNE 4,

C. PFEIFFER, et al., 2024 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 9, 2024, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and the Court found that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 12 at pg 14. As a result, Plaintiff was ordered to file a first amended complaint and was given thirty days to do so. Id. At that time, Plaintiff was also cautioned that his failure to fully comply with the order within the time allotted might result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. Id. More than thirty days has now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.