Unknown
(PC) Joseph v. Unknown
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALONZO JAMES JOSEPH, Case No. 2:23-cv-02932-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE CLERK OF COURT BE
DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS MATTER
UNKNOWN,
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
Defendant. DAYS 16 Plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Joseph v. Penner, No. 2:18-cv-02597-JAM-DMC (designating plaintiff as a “three-striker”). Accordingly, on March 14, 2024, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 3. I also recommended that plaintiff be directed to tender the filing fee. Id. Plaintiff did not file objections or tender the filing fee. On April 11, 2024, the district judge adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to tender the filing fee within thirty days. ECF No. 8 at 2. The district judge referred the matter back…