Unknown

(PC) Joseph v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20242:23-cv-02932California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALONZO JAMES JOSEPH, Case No. 2:23-cv-02932-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE CLERK OF COURT BE

DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS MATTER

UNKNOWN,

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

Defendant. DAYS 16 Plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Joseph v. Penner, No. 2:18-cv-02597-JAM-DMC (designating plaintiff as a “three-striker”). Accordingly, on March 14, 2024, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 3. I also recommended that plaintiff be directed to tender the filing fee. Id. Plaintiff did not file objections or tender the filing fee. On April 11, 2024, the district judge adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to tender the filing fee within thirty days. ECF No. 8 at 2. The district judge referred the matter back…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.