Arviza

(HC) Morales-Ramirez v. Arviza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20241:23-cv-00711California3,710 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEOBARDO MORALES-RAMIREZ, No. 1:23-cv-00711-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS1

13 v. (Doc. No. 20) 14

M. ARVIZA,

15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Leobardo Morales-Ramirez (“Petitioner”), a federal inmate, is proceeding pro 18 se with his first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, filed while he 19 was incarcerated at Federal Correctional Institution (FCI) Mendota, located in Fresno County, 20 California, which is within the venue and jurisdiction of this Court. (Doc. No. 4, “Petition"). The 21 Petition raises three claims: (1) Petitioner is entitled to “immediate release” pursuant to accrued 22 good time credit (GCT) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b)(1); (2) Petitioner is “entitled to a refund” 23 of $500 for a “monetary fine” imposed by a disciplinary hearing officer; and (3) the Bureau of 24 Prisons (“BOP”) unlawfully excludes Petitioner from applying earned time credits (FTCs) 25 because of his immigration status, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.