Jones

(PC) Craig v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20242:22-cv-01874California3,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL A. CRAIG, No. 2:22-cv-01874 DAD- AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GENA JONES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has paid the filing fee for this action. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s amended complaint and motion for the appointment of counsel are now before the court. I. Motion for the Appointment of Counsel Plaintiff has requested appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.