Choate

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 GEORGE GRAHAM CHOATE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00570-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

13 v. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 14 KINGS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

15 Defendants. DISTRICT JUDGE 16 (ECF No. 1) 17 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 19 20 Plaintiff George Graham Choate (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 21 initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Kings County 22 Superior Court and Kings County Superior Court Judge “Fandy” Edwards on May 13, 2024. The 23 complaint is currently before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 24 I. 25 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 26 Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case at any 27 time if the Court determines…