(HC) Calderon v. Board of Parole Hearings of CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-2554 CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent. 16

17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the 21 costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 23 Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all 24 petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the 25 petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review. 26 In his first claim, petitioner asserts that his being denied parole has violated his Fourteenth 27 Amendment right to due…