Unknown

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAD ANDRE CHRISTENSEN, No. 2:24-CV-0979-DMC-P Petitioner, v. ORDER UNKNOWN, and Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See ECF No. 1. Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. In this case it is clear that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief because the petition challenges the conditions of his confinement and not the fact or duration of confinement. / / /…