Unknown

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAD ANDRE CHRISTENSEN, No. 2:24-CV-0979-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNKNOWN, and 15 Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s petition for a writ 19 of habeas corpus. See ECF No. 1. 20 Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary 21 dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits 22 annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” In the instant case, it 23 is plain that Petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief. In this case it is clear that Petitioner 24 is not entitled to habeas relief because the petition challenges the conditions of his confinement 25 and not the fact or duration of confinement. 26 / / /…