Carter

Carter v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20241:23-cv-01775California4,139 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY CARTER, Case No. 1:23-cv-01775-KES-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 12 FOR RECONSIDERATION v. 13 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT WILLARD L. JACKSON, et al., PETRESCU TO CLARIFY FEBRUARY 12, 14 2024 FILING Defendants. 15 ORDER VACATING HEARING

IMPROPERLY SET FOR MAY 28, 2024

16 (ECF No. 39) 17

TEN-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 I. 20 INTRODUCTION 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Jeffrey Carter’s motion for reconsideration of the 22 Court’s April 5, 2024 order precluding Plaintiff from making untimely discovery requests prior 23 to discovery commencing pursuant to Rule 26. (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff improperly set a hearing 24 for May 28, 2024, which will be vacated. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision 25 without oral argument and therefore the hearing will not be re-set. See Local Rule 230(g). The 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.