Vela

Vela v. Porterville Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20241:24-cv-00564California1,840 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 PASTOR ISABEL VELA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00564-SAB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

13 v. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

14 PORTERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

15 Defendant. DISTRICT JUDGE

16 (ECF No. 1)

17 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 19 Plaintiff Pastor Isabel Vela (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated 20 this action on May 13, 2024, against the Porterville Police Department for violation of the Freedom 21 of Information Act. The complaint is now before this Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 1915(e)(2)(B). 23 I. 24 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 25 Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case at any 26 time if the Court determines the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.