Condrashoff
Condrashoff v. General Motors LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE W. CONDRASHOFF, et al., No. 2:24-cv-00108-DAD-DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS
GENERAL MOTORS LLC, (Doc. No. 5) Defendant.
16 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss certain claims brought by plaintiffs in this action. (Doc. No. 5.) On February 5, 2024, the pending motion was taken under submission to be decided on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 7.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs George W. Condrashoff and Benita Gwyn Asher bring this automobile “lemon law” and fraud action against defendant General Motors LLC (“defendant” or “GM”), alleging the following in their complaint. In August or September 2020, plaintiffs acquired a new 2020 Chevrolet Bolt (“the subject vehicle”) from “Tracy Chevrolet, an authorized dealer and agent of…