Medina

Medina v. Mapes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20241:21-cv-00844California5,201 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRADLEY MEDINA, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00844-JLT-EPG 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S

13 v. MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT

REPORTS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY

14

COURTNEY L. MAPES, M.D., JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 52 and 63-1). 16

17 This case proceeds on Plaintiffs’ complaint, dated May 25, 2021, which asserts claims for 18 medical negligence, lack of informed consent, and loss of consortium against Defendant Courtney 19 L. Mapes, M.D., a physician at a federal hospital that specializes in medical treatment for 20 veterans. 21 On July 31, 2023, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 52). On 22 September 15, 2023, Plaintiffs filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion, relying largely on 23 medical expert opinions. (ECF No. 62). Defendant’s reply objects to the expert reports submitted 24 by Plaintiffs as not complying with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and asks the Court to 25 strike the reports.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.