Amanda

(PC) Wright v. Amanda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20242:23-cv-01532California542 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEWAYNE A. WRIGHT, No. 2:23-CV-1532-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AMANDA, et al., and 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On March 13, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint 20 within 60 days. Plaintiff has been warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 21 action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 22 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. 23 The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. 24 See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal 25 Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in 26 expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.