Valencia

(PC) McClintock v. Valencia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20242:22-cv-01884California977 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 John McClintock, No. 2:22-cv-01884 KJM CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. Valencia, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 21, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court adopts the findings and recommendations with respect to whether plaintiff has sufficiently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.