Bellone

Bellone v. Roaring Camp, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20195:19-cv-00307California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CHUCK BELLONE, Case No.19-cv-00307-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO DISMISS

GADABOUT TOURS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 25 Defendants.

Following the stipulated dismissal of defendant Roaring Camp, Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), plaintiff Chuck Bellone served the first amended complaint and summons on defendants Gadabout Tours, Inc., Lois Anderson, and Mark Anderson (collectively, “the Gadabout defendants”). Dkt. Nos. 19, 20, 21, 22. The Gadabout defendants moved to dismiss the first amended complaint on September 4, 2019. Dkt. No. 25. On September 9, 2019, plaintiff Chuck Bellone filed a second amended complaint as a matter of course pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B). Dkt. No. 29. A plaintiff may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within 21 days of service of a motion under Rule 12(b). Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). An amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.