Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC., Case No. 16-cv-06711-JSW
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE
ORDER, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 88 11 Defendants. 12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion for relief from Magistrate Judge Kim’s Order regarding the designation of Harold Pestana and production of documents from Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s core gas supply (“CGS”) department, filed by Plaintiff Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. (“Tiger”). The Court has considered the parties’ briefs, relevant legal authority, the record in this case, and it has had the benefit of oral argument. BACKGROUND On July 31, 2018, following a discovery dispute, Magistrate Judge Kim issued an Order in which she denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendants to produce documents relating to the CGS department. (See Order on Discovery Dispute…