Feamster

Feamster v. Gaco Western, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20194:18-cv-01327California371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SCOTT FEAMSTER, Case No. 18-cv-01327-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

GACO WESTERN, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 67 Defendant.

12 On September 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order allowing attorney Sherri L. Kelly to withdraw as Plaintiff’s counsel. See Dkt. No. 67. In the July 19 order, the Court reasoned that the motion to withdraw satisfied both Civil Local Rule 11-5(a) and the California Rules of Professional Conduct given the irreparable breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. See Dkt. No. 62 at 2–3. A party seeking reconsideration of an interlocutory order must “show reasonable diligence in bringing the motion” and—as relevant here—either that “a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the Court” before the challenged order, or “[a] manifest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.