Chevron Mining Inc. v. Skanska USA Civil West Rocky Mountain District, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20193:19-cv-04144California631 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 CHEVRON MINING INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04144-LB

12 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DIRECTING PRODUCTION

13 v. OF SKANSKA/TETRA TECH

ARBITRATION RECORDS

14 SKANSKA USA CIVIL WEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN DISTRICT, INC., Re: ECF No. 34 15 Defendant. 16 17 The court assumes the reader’s familiarity with the subject matter and procedural history of 18 this case. Briefly stated, the plaintiffs (collectively, “Chevron”) sought expedited discovery and an 19 order directing defendant Skanska USA Civil West Rocky Mountain District, Inc. to produce 20 transcripts of deposition and hearing testimony in connection with an arbitration between Skanska 21 and Tetra Tech EC, Inc., as well as any related settlement (the transcripts and settlement 22 collectively, the “Arbitration Materials”).1 The court ordered that Chevron could take expedited 23 discovery of Skanska.2 Skanska has not produced the Arbitration Materials. Skanska 24 acknowledges that it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.