Fu

Fu v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20204:18-cv-04668California357 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TONY FU, Case No. 18-cv-04668-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. 9 Re: ECF No. 16 10 MATTHEW P. SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Plaintiff Tony Fu, proceeding pro se, brings claims against Defendants Matthew P. 14 Sullivan and the City and County of San Francisco, stemming from an allegedly wrongful arrest. 15 ECF Nos. 1, 16. 16 Fu originally brought this lawsuit against Defendants Demas Yan, Thai Ming Chu, Tina 17 Yan, Mark Lapham, and Legal Recovery LLC. ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 4-8. Magistrate Judge James 18 granted Fu’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 8. Judge James further 19 recommended that Fu’s complaint be dismissed with leave to amend because it failed to identify a 20 governmental actor to support his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Id. After the case was 21 reassigned, this Court adopted Judge James’s recommendation and dismissed with leave to amend. 22 ECF No. 12. 23 Fu’s amended complaint has cured this defect by naming a municipal official…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.