San Pedro-Salcedo v. The Haagen-Dazs Shoppe Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20195:17-cv-03504California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

MELANIE G. SAN PEDRO-SALCEDO,

Case No. 5:17-cv-03504-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO INCREASE PAGE LIMIT

THE HAAGEN-DAZS SHOPPE

COMPANY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 108 Defendant.

Defendant has filed an administrative motion seeking leave to file a reply brief in support of its summary judgment motion that exceeds the 15-page limit set by Civil Local Rule 7-2(c). Defendant contends that good cause exists because (a) Plaintiff’s opposition brief (Dkt. No. 100) contains numerous, substantive footnotes that do not comply with the court’s standing order for civil cases, and (b) the opposition improperly relies on previously undisclosed documents. The court’s standing order provides that “[f]ootnotes shall be in no less than 12-point type and shall be double-spaced.” Standing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.