San Pedro-Salcedo v. The Haagen-Dazs Shoppe Company, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 9

MELANIE G. SAN PEDRO-SALCEDO,

10 Case No. 5:17-cv-03504-EJD Plaintiff, 11 ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 12 INCREASE PAGE LIMIT

THE HAAGEN-DAZS SHOPPE

13 COMPANY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 108 14 Defendant.

15 Defendant has filed an administrative motion seeking leave to file a reply brief in support 16 of its summary judgment motion that exceeds the 15-page limit set by Civil Local Rule 7-2(c). 17 Defendant contends that good cause exists because (a) Plaintiff’s opposition brief (Dkt. No. 100) 18 contains numerous, substantive footnotes that do not comply with the court’s standing order for 19 civil cases, and (b) the opposition improperly relies on previously undisclosed documents. The 20 court’s standing order provides that “[f]ootnotes shall be in no less than 12-point type and shall be 21 double-spaced.” Standing…