Brooks

Brooks v. The GEO Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20194:18-cv-04578California1,762 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AUNTRELL BROOKS, Case No. 18-cv-04578-DMR

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

9 v. AMEND AND REMANDING CASE TO

ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR

10 THE GEO GROUP, INC., COURT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 38

12 Plaintiff Auntrell Brooks moves for leave to file a first amended complaint (“FAC”) 13 adding two new defendants, and to remand this action in the event the court grants him leave to 14 amend. [Docket No. 38.] The court held a hearing on July 31, 2019, and ordered Brooks to file a 15 new proposed FAC that includes citizenship allegations for the two proposed defendants, which 16 Brooks timely filed. [Docket Nos. 55, 57 (Proposed FAC).] For the following reasons, the motion 17 is granted and this matter is remanded to Alameda County Superior Court. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Brooks, a citizen of California (see Docket No. 57), filed this action against Defendant The 20 Geo Group, Inc. dba GEO California, Inc. (“GEO”) and Does 1-60 in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.