Emami

Emami v. Nielsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20193:18-cv-01587California1,225 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FARANGIS EMAMI, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01587-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 117 KEVIN K. McALEENAN, et al., Defendants.

PARS EQUALITY CENTER, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07818-JD

Plaintiffs, v. Re: Dkt. No. 138

MIKE POMPEO, et al., Defendants.

This order resolves the multiple discovery disagreements between the parties that are outlined in the joint discovery report. Dkt. No. 117 (Case No. 18-1587). The prior dismissal order held that plaintiffs had adequately alleged a claim under United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954), with respect to whether the State Department has failed to abide by its own rules and procedures for the waiver program that was created pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 9645. Dkt. No. 74 (Case No. 18-1587) at 13-16. The allegations that were key to sustaining the claim over the government’s Rule 12(b)(6) challenge included factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.