Casey

Casey v. City of Santa Rosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20194:18-cv-07731California2,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT CASEY, Case No. 4:18-cv-07731-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

v. COUNTY OF SONOMA AND GREG SCHMIDT'S MOTION TO DISMISS CITY OF SANTA ROSA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 Defendants.

12 On July 24, 2019, Defendants Greg Schmidt and the County of Sonoma filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s third amended complaint. On September 5, 2019, the Court held a hearing, and, after careful consideration of the parties’ arguments and the applicable legal authority, for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND On June 1, 2018, Plaintiff Robert Casey was detained and arrested in Santa Rosa, California. (Third Am. Compl., “TAC,” Dkt No. 37 ¶ 16.) Plaintiff alleges that he was searching for his runaway dog with the help of a stranger along a trail when Defendant officers from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.