Juarez

Juarez v. Jani-King of California, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20194:09-cv-03495California750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO JUAREZ, ET AL., CASE NO. 09-cv-03495-YGR

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A STAY

vs. Re: Dkt. No. 288 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

Pending before the Court is defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Decision of the California Supreme Court. (Dkt. No. 288.) Having read and considered the filings on the motion, and for good cause showing, the motion is DENIED.1 Federal courts have broad, inherent authority to stay their own proceedings pending the resolution of another matter, when the resolution of that other matter could affect the case before the court. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); Mediterranean Ents., Inc. v. Ssangyong Corp., 708 F.2d 1458, 1465 (9th Cir. 1983) (“A trial court may, with propriety, find it is efficient for its own docket and the fairest course for the parties to enter a stay of an action before it, pending resolution of independent proceedings which bear upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.