Yucesoy
Yucesoy v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, et al., Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
v. MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL
AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., ATTORNEYS’ FEES Defendants. Docket Nos. 954, 935
12 Plaintiffs brought two lawsuits against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., alleging that Uber misclassifies its drivers as independent contractors rather than as employees. See O’Connor v. Uber Techs., Inc., Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Docket No. 330 ¶ 3; Yucesoy v. Uber Techs., Inc., Case No. 15-cv-262-EMC, Docket No. 292 ¶ 2. Five years of contentious litigation ensued. The parties eventually entered into an agreement to settle both suits, and on March 29, 2019, the Court granted preliminary approval to the parties’ class action settlement. O’Connor, Docket No. 930 (“Prelim. Approval Order”); Yucesoy, Docket No. 332. For the reasons stated on the record and as explained below, the…