Vendavo, Inc. v. Price f(x) AG
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VENDAVO, INC.,
Case No. 17-cv-06930-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND PRICE F(X) AG, et al., DENYING MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Defendants.
The factual background of this matter has been set out in several prior substantive orders and will not be recounted here. Now pending is a motion by plaintiff to dismiss the counterclaims, and two motions by defendants seeking to enjoin plaintiff from pursuing other litigation arising from this dispute. Having been submitted without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7- 1(b), the motions will be denied. 21 A. Motion to dismiss counterclaims 1. Specification of trade secrets At the outset of this case, defendants successfully moved to dismiss plaintiff’s trade secret claims. That order, which provided leave to amend, observed that while a claim “need…