Liveperson, Inc. v. [24]7.ai, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20194:17-cv-01268California695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LIVEPERSON, INC., Case No. 17-cv-01268-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CERTAIN MOTIONS IN

v. LIMINE AND DISPUTED JURY

INSTRUCTIONS

[24]7.AI, INC., Re: ECF No. 571, 572, 574, 608 Defendant.

12 Following are the Court’s rulings on certain motions in limine and disputed jury instructions that were discussed, but not ruled upon, at the September 13, 2019, pretrial conference: LivePerson’s Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Argument, Evidence, or Testimony that LivePerson Rules Present in [24]7’s System are Deactivated. This motion is granted. The Court finds that [24]7 failed to disclose its contention that it deactivated LivePerson’s rules even though it was under an obligation to do so. At minimum, [24]7 should have made this disclosure in its Supplemental Responses to LivePerson’s Questions Regarding Use of the Alleged Trade Secrets. See ECF No. 567-6. [24]7 suggests that it met any obligation of disclosure because it already …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.