Liveperson, Inc. v. [24]7.ai, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20194:17-cv-01268California695 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LIVEPERSON, INC., Case No. 17-cv-01268-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CERTAIN MOTIONS IN

9 v. LIMINE AND DISPUTED JURY

INSTRUCTIONS

10 [24]7.AI, INC., Re: ECF No. 571, 572, 574, 608 Defendant. 11

12 13 Following are the Court’s rulings on certain motions in limine and disputed jury 14 instructions that were discussed, but not ruled upon, at the September 13, 2019, pretrial 15 conference: 16 LivePerson’s Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Argument, Evidence, or Testimony that 17 LivePerson Rules Present in [24]7’s System are Deactivated. This motion is granted. The Court 18 finds that [24]7 failed to disclose its contention that it deactivated LivePerson’s rules even though 19 it was under an obligation to do so. At minimum, [24]7 should have made this disclosure in its 20 Supplemental Responses to LivePerson’s Questions Regarding Use of the Alleged Trade Secrets. 21 See ECF No. 567-6. [24]7 suggests that it met any obligation of disclosure because it already 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.