Peter Schuman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PETER SCHUMAN, et al., Case No. 16-cv-5544-HSG (TSH) 8 Plaintiffs, Case No. 17-cv-1864-HSG (TSH)

9 v.

DISCOVERY ORDER

10 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 116, 117 11 Defendants. 12 13 ROBIN BERMAN, et al., 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.

16 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, et al., 17 Defendants. 18

19 The parties submitted a joint discovery letter brief on July 23, 2019, requesting in camera 20 review of certain documents in Microchip and Wilson Sonsini’s privilege logs. ECF No. 116.1 In 21 an order dated July 3, 2019, the Court directed the parties to “meet and confer to identify a 22 representative sample of approximately ten to fifteen e-mails for the Court’s in camera review.” 23 ECF No. 115. In a joint letter brief dated July 26, 2019, the parties identified twelve emails that 24 would be submitted for in camera review. ECF No. 117. On August 2, 2019, Defendants 25 submitted the emails to the Court. 26 27 1 The main issue is whether these…