Adkins
Adkins v. Adkins
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARTEMIZ ADKINS, Case No. 19-cv-05535-HSG
8 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
9 v. TEMPORARY RETRAINING ORDER
10 GARRETT ADKINS, Re: Dkt. No. 6 11 Respondent.
12 13 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Artemiz Adkins’ Motion for a Temporary 14 Restraining Order (“TRO”) enjoining Respondent Garrett Adkins from violating the Hague 15 Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Convention”), as 16 implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), pending a 17 preliminary injunction hearing. See Dkt. No. 6. For the reasons detailed below, the Court 18 GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Petitioner, who resides in Switzerland, seeks the return of her and Respondent’s four-year- 21 old daughter, A.F.A. See Dkt. No. 1. According to Petitioner’s Verified Complaint and Petition 22 for Return of Child Under 16 Years Old,…