Adkins

Adkins v. Adkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20194:19-cv-05535California1,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARTEMIZ ADKINS, Case No. 19-cv-05535-HSG

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. TEMPORARY RETRAINING ORDER

GARRETT ADKINS, Re: Dkt. No. 6 Respondent.

12 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Artemiz Adkins’ Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) enjoining Respondent Garrett Adkins from violating the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Convention”), as implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), pending a preliminary injunction hearing. See Dkt. No. 6. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner, who resides in Switzerland, seeks the return of her and Respondent’s four-year- old daughter, A.F.A. See Dkt. No. 1. According to Petitioner’s Verified Complaint and Petition for Return of Child Under 16 Years Old,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.