Narcisse

Narcisse v. Tafesse

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20195:16-cv-00682California3,641 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

DJOLIBA NARCISSE,

8 Case No. 5:16-cv-00682-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 EZRA TAFESSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 127 11 Defendants. 12

13 Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of this Court’s order granting Defendants Tafesse, 14 Vasquez, and Kim’s motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff’s deliberate 15 indifference claim. Plaintiff’s motion will be DENIED. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 The facts remain disputed. Both parties, however, agree that on January 29, 2012, at 18 Hercules Police Department (“HPD”) a blood draw occurred after which Plaintiff was taken to the 19 Martinez Detention Facility. 20 A. Facts According to Plaintiff 21 Plaintiff claims he was taken to the HPD booking room and then handcuffed to a bench. 22 See Narcisse Decl. ¶ 45, Dkt. No. 95. About an hour later, he was ordered to sit “like a seesaw”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.