Haley
Haley v. Clark Construction Group-California, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAWRENCE HALEY, Case No. 18-cv-07542-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
MOTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. GRANTED
CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP- Re: Dkt. No.
CALIFORNIA, INC.,
11 Defendant.
13 On May 21, 2019, Defendant filed a motion requesting that the Court modify its scheduling order to provide that trial will be a bench rather than a jury trial. Dkt. No. 23. To date, Plaintiff has not filed his opposition, although he has been actively participating in the case. In general, an opposition must be filed and served “not more than 14 days after the motion was filed.” L.R. 7-3(a). The Court may interpret a failure to oppose a motion as a concession that the motion should be granted. See GN Resound A/S v. Callpod, Inc., No. C 11-04673 SBA, 2013 WL 1190651, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013) (construing plaintiff’s failure to oppose defendant’s argument as a concession of said argument); see also Marziano v. Cty of Marin,…