Beasley

Beasley v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20193:18-cv-07144California10,140 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARK BEASLEY, Case No. 18-cv-07144-MMC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

10 LUCKY STORES, INC., et al., AMEND; GRANTING DEFENDANT

NESTLÉ USA’S MOTION TO STRIKE;

11 Defendants. CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 36, 38 13 14 Before the Court are two motions, both filed May 23, 2019: (1) a Motion to Dismiss 15 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed jointly by all defendants to the instant action, 16 pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and (2) a Motion to 17 Strike Portions of the First Amended Complaint, filed by defendant Nestlé USA, Inc. 18 (“Nestlé” or “Nestlé USA”), pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 19 Plaintiff Mark Beasley (“Beasley”) has filed opposition to each said motion, to which 20 defendants have replied. Having read and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.