Castillo-Antonio

Castillo-Antonio v. Bueno

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20193:18-cv-04589California4,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JOSE DANIEL CASTILLO-ANTONIO, Case No.18-cv-04589-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES

GUADALUPE ANTONIO BUENO, Re: Dkt. No. 46 Defendant.

10 Plaintiff Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio (“Plaintiff”), a physically disabled person, and Defendant Guadalupe Antonio Bueno (“Defendant Bueno”), the owner and operator of Tacos Sinaloa, reached a settlement agreement after Plaintiff sued Defendant for multiple Americans with Disabilities Act violations, claiming that Bueno’s business was inaccessible to Plaintiff and others. (Dkt. No. 43.)1, Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. (Dkt. No. 46). After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, and having had the benefit of oral argument on August 29, 2019, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees because the total hours sought are not reasonable. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.