Castillo-Antonio
Castillo-Antonio v. Bueno
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 JOSE DANIEL CASTILLO-ANTONIO, Case No.18-cv-04589-JSC
6 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
7 v. FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
8 GUADALUPE ANTONIO BUENO, Re: Dkt. No. 46 Defendant. 9
10 11 Plaintiff Jose Daniel Castillo-Antonio (“Plaintiff”), a physically disabled person, and 12 Defendant Guadalupe Antonio Bueno (“Defendant Bueno”), the owner and operator of Tacos 13 Sinaloa, reached a settlement agreement after Plaintiff sued Defendant for multiple Americans 14 with Disabilities Act violations, claiming that Bueno’s business was inaccessible to Plaintiff and 15 others. (Dkt. No. 43.)1, 2 Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. (Dkt. 16 No. 46). After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, and having had the benefit of oral 17 argument on August 29, 2019, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees 18 because the total hours sought are not reasonable. 19 BACKGROUND 20 I. Complaint Allegations &…