Scianna

Scianna v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20195:18-cv-03145California175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MARCI SCIANNA, et al., Case No.18-cv-03145-NC

Plaintiffs, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL

DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 70 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant.

a 16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

|| no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: September 17, 2019 hGe<——— —_—>

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.