Bolden

Bolden v. Arana

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20194:17-cv-05607California2,236 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIE BOLDEN, Case No. 17-cv-05607-PJH

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

9 v. COMPEL

10 S. ARANA, Re: Dkt. Nos. 40, 50, 52 Defendant. 11

12 13 This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 14 1983. His claims arise from his detention at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). Plaintiff 15 alleges that the sole defendant in this case, Correctional Officer Arana, searched his cell 16 and confiscated several items. Plaintiff alleges that he told defendant that he would file 17 an administrative grievance if the items were not returned to him and in response 18 defendant threatened him, stating, “I’ll get you for that.” Later, after defendant learned 19 that plaintiff was found not guilty at a Rules Violation Report (“RVR”) disciplinary hearing, 20 defendant stated, “[n]o way. I’ll fix that,” according to plaintiff, and immediately spoke 21 with the hearing officer. Plaintiff was found guilty of the violation. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.