Laine
Laine v. Superior Court of Alameda County Hayward Hall of Justice
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSHUA LAINE, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-04390-JD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 152, 163, 164, 167, 168, 169,
172, 173, 174, 175, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA 185, 186, 187, 190, 194, 209
COUNTY HAYWARD HALL OF
JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs (“Laine”) filed a putative class action against a number of California state courts, state court judges, state court personnel, counties, attorneys and others for claims arising out of state court family law proceedings. Dkt. No. 152. After a prior dismissal with leave to amend, Laine has not established federal subject matter jurisdiction, and so the case is dismissed. Laine has the burden of establishing jurisdiction. See Kingman Reef Atoll Invs., L.L.C. v. United States, 541 F.3d 1189, 1197 (9th Cir. 2008). The Court’s prior order of dismissal concluded that this case is fundamentally a child custody dispute, which means there is no…