Finjan, LLC. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20195:17-cv-00072California815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL AT ECF 329

CISCO SYSTEMS INC., [RE: ECF 329] Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant’s administrative motion to file under seal portions of the briefing and exhibits submitted in connection with Defendant’s Reply in Support of Its Motion to Strike Finjan’s Expert Reports on Infringement (332). ECF 329. For the reasons that follow, the motion to seal is GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n. 7 (1978)). Accordingly, when considering a sealing request, “a ‘strong presumption in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.