Simms

Simms v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20193:18-cv-03897California5,342 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LIONELL SIMMS, Case No.18-cv-03897-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 27

SECURITY,

11 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Lionell Simms seeks social security benefits for a combination of mental and 14 physical impairments, including strokes, bad vision, memory loss, spinal arthritis, left arm 15 arthritis, organic mental disorder, affective disorder, and substance addition disorder. 16 (Administrative Record (“AR”) 15, 219, 234.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this 17 lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security 18 (“Commissioner”) denying his benefits claim. Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and 19 Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment.1 (Dkt. Nos. 19, 27.2) Because the Administrative 20 Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to provide specific and legitimate reasons supported by substantial 21 evidence for her weighing of the medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.