Simms

Simms v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20193:18-cv-03897California5,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LIONELL SIMMS, Case No.18-cv-03897-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 19,

SECURITY,

11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Lionell Simms seeks social security benefits for a combination of mental and physical impairments, including strokes, bad vision, memory loss, spinal arthritis, left arm arthritis, organic mental disorder, affective disorder, and substance addition disorder. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 15, 219, 234.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his benefits claim. Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 19, 27.2) Because the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to provide specific and legitimate reasons supported by substantial evidence for her weighing of the medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.