Bly

Bly v. Commisioner of Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20193:18-cv-02450California5,247 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARL ROBERT BLY, Case No.18-cv-02450-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 31

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

11 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Carl Robert Bly seeks social security benefits for a combination of mental and 14 physical impairments, including depression, anxiety, somatic symptom disorder, schizoid 15 personality disorder, gastritis/colitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, status post left metacarpal fracture, 16 hypertension, mild bilateral hearing loss, and obesity. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 27, 351, 17 921.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final 18 decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his benefits claim. 19 Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment.1 (Dkt. 20 Nos. 23, 31.) Because the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) weighing of the medical evidence 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.