Bly

Bly v. Commisioner of Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20193:18-cv-02450California5,247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARL ROBERT BLY, Case No.18-cv-02450-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 23,

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Carl Robert Bly seeks social security benefits for a combination of mental and physical impairments, including depression, anxiety, somatic symptom disorder, schizoid personality disorder, gastritis/colitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, status post left metacarpal fracture, hypertension, mild bilateral hearing loss, and obesity. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 27, 351, 921.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his benefits claim. Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 23, 31.) Because the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) weighing of the medical evidence …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.