Huang

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 WERIDE CORP., et al., 8 Case No. 5:18-cv-07233-EJD Plaintiffs, 9 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE 10 PRETRIAL ORDER KUN HUANG, et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 281 Defendants. 12

13 Defendants ZZX and AllRide move for relief from Magistrate Judge Cousins’s non- 14 dispositive, pretrial Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (the 15 “Order”). Dkt. No. 252. The court has reviewed ZZX and AllRide’s motion, the Order, and the 16 briefing underlying the Order. The court denies the motion. 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) provides that a party may file a motion for relief 18 from a magistrate judge’s non-dispositive order and that the district judge must modify or set aside 19 any part of the magistrate judge’s order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law. “When 20 reviewing…