Huang

WeRide Corp. v. Huang

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20195:18-cv-07233California497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 WERIDE CORP., et al., Case No. 5:18-cv-07233-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER KUN HUANG, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 281 Defendants.

Defendants ZZX and AllRide move for relief from Magistrate Judge Cousins’s non- dispositive, pretrial Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (the “Order”). Dkt. No. 252. The court has reviewed ZZX and AllRide’s motion, the Order, and the briefing underlying the Order. The court denies the motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) provides that a party may file a motion for relief from a magistrate judge’s non-dispositive order and that the district judge must modify or set aside any part of the magistrate judge’s order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law. “When reviewing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.