Samuels

Samuels v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20195:18-cv-01872California11,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHAEL SAMUELS, Case No.18-cv-01872-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 20,

SECURITY,

12 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Michael Samuels appeals a final decision by defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1381, et seq. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 20, 30. Pursuant to the Court’s order (Dkt. No. 19), each side also submitted statements of the administrative record. Dkt. Nos. 21, 31, 35. The matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, the relevant evidence of record, and for the reasons set forth below, Mr. Samuel’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.