Wilson
Wilson v. Bank of America Pension Plan for Legacy Companies
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRUCE E. WILSON, Case No. 18-cv-07755-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION AND PARTIAL
MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND
BANK OF AMERICA PENSION PLAN AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LEGACY COMPANIES, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 50, 51 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION This case concerns a dispute over pension benefits Plaintiff Bruce E. Wilson accrued while working for Bank of America (“BOA”) from 1972 to 1988 and from 1999 to 2000. In its order granting in part and denying in part Fidelity’s first motion to dismiss, the Court denied the motion with respect to the question of whether Wilson’s state-law tort claims are preempted by ERISA. ECF No. 33. Fidelity now asks the Court to reconsider its findings on that issue. ECF No. 50. Wilson filed an Opposition to the Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 58) and Fidelity filed its Reply (ECF No. 60). For the reasons set forth below, the…