Walker

Walker v. Popow

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20193:19-cv-02944California1,614 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEEWIN L. WALKER, Case No. 19-cv-02944-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

9 v. TO AMEND

10 M. POPOW, et al., Docket No. 1 11 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Keewin L. Walker, a prisoner at the Pelican Bay State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights 15 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint is now before the court for review under 28 U.S.C. 16 § 1915A. 17 II. BACKGROUND 18 Mr. Walker alleges the following in his complaint: 19 Mr. Walker works “with chemicals daily, bio-material occasionally & blood spills often,” 20 and therefore must shower before dinner and wash his clothes daily. Docket No. 1 at 3. 21 Correctional officer (C/O) Popal intentionally delayed Mr. Walker’s shower which eventually 22 became such an issue that supervisors caused a note to be put in the tower stating that Mr. Walker 23 was to receive his shower before the evening meal. Sergeant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.