Arvin Kam Construction Company v. Environmental Chemical Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20193:16-cv-02643California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARVIN KAM CONSTRUCTION Case No. 16-cv-02643-JD

COMPANY,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 9 v.

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL

CORPORATION, Defendant. 12 On April 15, 2019, the Court entered partial summary judgment in favor of defendants. Dkt. No. 53. The order dismissed plaintiff Kam Construction’s primary claims against defendants, and reserved for further proceedings a few tailing fraud counts. The Court expressly directed the parties to work out a schedule for summary judgment proceedings on the remaining claims. Id. at 9. No proposed schedule was filed. Kam Construction has done nothing at all since April 2019 to advance the prosecution of the case. In light of this inactivity, the Court was concerned that Kam Construction had abandoned the action. Consequently, on September 5, 2019, the Court issued an order for Kam Construction to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Dkt. No. 54. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.