Banks

Banks v. Mortimer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20194:18-cv-07391-HSGCalifornia4,311 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GREGORY A BANKS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07391-HSG

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

9 v. DISMISS

10 MICHAEL MORTIMER, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 17, 18 11 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, bring this civil rights action against the City of Antioch, 14 Contra Costa County, and individual employees of both the City and County,1 following the death 15 of Nathan Banks. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). 16 Pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to 17 state a claim: the first, filed by Defendants Livingston, Grove, Alexander, and Contra Costa 18 (collectively, “County Defendants”), see Dkt. No. 15 (“County Mot.”); the second, filed by 19 Defendants Mortimer, Colley, and Antioch (collectively, “City Defendants”), see Dkt. No. 17 20 (“City Mot.”); and the third filed by Defendant Guichard, see Dkt. No. 18 (“Guichard Mot.”). The 21 Court finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.