Banks
Banks v. Mortimer
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GREGORY A BANKS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07391-HSG
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
9 v. DISMISS
10 MICHAEL MORTIMER, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 17, 18 11 Defendants.
12 13 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, bring this civil rights action against the City of Antioch, 14 Contra Costa County, and individual employees of both the City and County,1 following the death 15 of Nathan Banks. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). 16 Pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to 17 state a claim: the first, filed by Defendants Livingston, Grove, Alexander, and Contra Costa 18 (collectively, “County Defendants”), see Dkt. No. 15 (“County Mot.”); the second, filed by 19 Defendants Mortimer, Colley, and Antioch (collectively, “City Defendants”), see Dkt. No. 17 20 (“City Mot.”); and the third filed by Defendant Guichard, see Dkt. No. 18 (“Guichard Mot.”). The 21 Court finds…