Banks

Banks v. Mortimer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20194:18-cv-07391-HSGCalifornia4,311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GREGORY A BANKS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-07391-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

MICHAEL MORTIMER, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 17, 18 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, bring this civil rights action against the City of Antioch, Contra Costa County, and individual employees of both the City and County,1 following the death of Nathan Banks. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). Pending before the Court are three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim: the first, filed by Defendants Livingston, Grove, Alexander, and Contra Costa (collectively, “County Defendants”), see Dkt. No. 15 (“County Mot.”); the second, filed by Defendants Mortimer, Colley, and Antioch (collectively, “City Defendants”), see Dkt. No. 17 (“City Mot.”); and the third filed by Defendant Guichard, see Dkt. No. 18 (“Guichard Mot.”). The Court finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.