Cisneros

Cisneros v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20194:18-cv-01877California841 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MIGUEL A. CISNEROS, Case No. 18-cv-01877-HSG

8 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

9 v. Dkt. No. 59 10 JIM ROBERTSON, 11 Respondent.

12 13 Petitioner, a state prisoner presently incarcerated in Pelican Bay State Prison, filed a pro se 14 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 5, 2019, the 15 Court dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies without prejudice to 16 petitioner returning to federal court after exhausting his state court remedies by presenting his 17 claims to the California Supreme Court. Dkt. Nos. 57, 58. The Court denied a certificate of 18 appealability and entered judgment in favor of respondent. Id. 19 Petitioner has filed a pleading titled “Opposition Argument for the Court to re[-]amend 20 petition and not grant the dismissal base on defens[e] evidence presented significant probative 21 value to the ruling of the motion dismissal of petition,” which the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.