Overton
Overton v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARCHIE OVERTON, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02166-EMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
v. MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Docket No. 103 Defendants.
12 13 Plaintiffs Archie Overton and S. Patrick Mendel filed suit against the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) and CPUC Commissioners (together, the “CPUC Defendants”) for creating a licensing scheme for Transportation Network Companies (“TNCs”) which Plaintiffs allege is preempted by federal transportation law and violates their constitutional rights. Plaintiffs also sued Rasier-CA, LLC for “acting in concert with the Commissioners” to “avoid and subvert” federal transportation laws. Finally, Plaintiffs sued Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries Uber USA, LLC, Rasier-Ca, LLC, and unknown Doe Defendants (collectively, “Uber Defendants” or “Uber”) under the Federal Motor Carrier Act (“FMCA”), 49 U.S.C. § 14102, and for several state…