Overton
Overton v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARCHIE OVERTON, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02166-EMC
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
9 v. MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Docket No. 103 11 Defendants.
12 13 14 Plaintiffs Archie Overton and S. Patrick Mendel filed suit against the California Public 15 Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) and CPUC Commissioners (together, the “CPUC Defendants”) 16 for creating a licensing scheme for Transportation Network Companies (“TNCs”) which Plaintiffs 17 allege is preempted by federal transportation law and violates their constitutional rights. Plaintiffs 18 also sued Rasier-CA, LLC for “acting in concert with the Commissioners” to “avoid and subvert” 19 federal transportation laws. Finally, Plaintiffs sued Uber Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries 20 Uber USA, LLC, Rasier-Ca, LLC, and unknown Doe Defendants (collectively, “Uber Defendants” 21 or “Uber”) under the Federal Motor Carrier Act (“FMCA”), 49 U.S.C. § 14102, and for several 22 state…