Grimes

Grimes v. Chisum

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20193:16-cv-01488California4,981 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSEPH GRIMES, Case No. 16-cv-01488-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff, 8

ORDER GRANTING

9 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 JOHN DUNLAP, et al., Dkt. Nos. 61, 78, and 79 Defendants. 11

12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Joseph Grimes alleges in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit that defendants 15 inflicted cruel and unusual punishment and violated his disability rights by denying him 16 gloves to wear when he operated his wheelchair. Defendants move for summary 17 judgment. Grimes failed to meet the California Probate Code’s requirements to sue the 18 estate of one defendant (Chisum); he sued her supervisor (Dunlap), who never treated 19 Grimes nor supervised his case; and there is no evidence of discrimination based on his 20 treatment. Nor does the record show deliberate indifference. For these reasons, 21 defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 22 BACKGROUND 23 This suit arises from the asserted denial of replacement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.