Stonehocker

Stonehocker v. Kindred Healthcare Operating, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20194:19-cv-02494California5,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SARAH STONEHOCKER, CASE NO. 19-cv-02494-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY

vs. JUDGMENT

KINDRED HEALTHCARE OPERATING, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant.

Plaintiff Sarah Stonehocker brings this putative class action against defendant Kindred Healthcare Operating, LLC alleging claims under California law for failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay wages when due, and unlawful business practices. Defendant now moves for an early summary judgment on grounds that (i) plaintiff is bound by the judgment and dismissal entered in Cashon v. Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-04889-RS (“Cashon”), and thus, plaintiff’s claims are barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion1; and (ii) plaintiff released her right to bring the claims asserted in this action through the Class Action Settlement Agreement and Stipulation approved by the court in Cashon. (Dkt. No. 18 (“MSJ”).) Having carefully…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.