ALDRICH

ALDRICH v. SAUL

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20193:19-cv-00104California10,876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JAMES A., Case No. 19-cv-00104-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner, Social Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 19 Security Administration, 10 Defendant. 11 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff James A. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Nancy A Berryhill, then-Acting Commissioner of Social Security,2 denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross- motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 14 (Pl.’s Mot.), 19 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for the following reasons. II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.