Kueck

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 A.M.K., et al., Case No. 18-cv-06004-DMR

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION 9 v. TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

10 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 56 11 Defendants.

12 Defendants Contra Costa County (“the County”) and Charm Wright move pursuant to 13 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiffs AMK and LTK’s 14 second amended complaint (“SAC”). [Docket No. 56.] The court held a hearing on June 13, 15 2019, and subsequently ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefing, which they timely 16 filed. [Docket Nos. 70-72.] For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in 17 part. Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a third and final amended complaint by no later than 14 18 days from the date of this order. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 A. Allegations in the SAC 21 This action arises out of the removal in 2014 of Plaintiffs AMK and LTK, who are children 22 (together,…